Oakfield plc, has surplus hard currency balances of ?23 million which are presently invested in short term money market sedimentations. The company is quoted on the London Stock Exchange and the current portion monetary value is 785pence.The company ‘s growing is achieved by strategic acquisitions and the excess hard currency available now is intended chiefly for this intent. The remit of the company ‘s acquisition commission is to place possible acquisition marks, and the most recent recommendation made by the commission is the purchase of Bird plc, a little company listed on the ( Alternate Investment Market ) AIM. The portions of this company are presently merchandising at 370pence. Bird plc operates in a different industry to Oakfield plc. Although Bird.plc is quoted, 50 % of its portions

are still owned by three managers, who have stated that they might be prepared to urge the sale of Bird, but they consider that its portions are deserving ? 22 million in entire.

The acquisition commission have provided the undermentioned industry informations in support of their recommendation ;

Oakfield plc




Average P/E ratio



Equity Beta



Net incomes Output

10.9 %

19.2 %

Average dividend growing ( last 5 old ages )

7 %

8 %

Average P/E of companies late

taken over based upon offer monetary value



The undermentioned economic informations is available ;

The current 3 month treasury- measure rate is 6 % per annum, and the market rate of return is 14 % per annum. The rate of rising prices is 2.4 % per annum and is expected to stay at about at this degree in the close hereafter.

The expected effects of acquisition would be as follows ;

Pre-tax advertisement and distribution nest eggs of ? 150 000 per twelvemonth ( at current monetary values ) would be possible.

Some land and edifices of Bird plc would be sold for ? 800 000 ( after revenue enhancement ) .

50 employees of Bird would instantly be made redundant at an after revenue enhancement cost of ? 1.2 million. Pre revenue enhancement one-year pay nest eggs are expected to be

?750 000 ( at current monetary values ) for the foreseeable hereafter.

The three bing managers of Bird plc would each be paid ? 100 000 per twelvemonth ( non index -linked ) for three old ages for consultancy services.

Summarised fiscal informations:

Oakfield plc Bird plc

? 000’s ? 000 ‘s

Turnover 480 000 38 000

Pre revenue enhancement operating hard currency flow 51 000 5 300

Dividend 11 000 842

The revenue enhancement rate is 33 %

Net Fixed Assets 168 000 8 400

Current Assets 135 000 4 700

Current liabilities 99 680 3 900

203 320 9 200

Financed by

Ordinary portions ( 25 P ) 10 000 Bird ( 10 P ) 500

Militias 158 320 5 200

10 % Bank term loan 15 000 recent 11 % 3500

12 % Debentures 2010 20 000

203 320 9 200


1 Explain why synergism might be when one company merges with or takes over another company. ( 20 Markss )

2 Estimate the value of Bird, and critically discourse the advantages and disadvantages of each of the rating methods you have used. ( assume hard currency flows over a 10 twelvemonth period ) . ( 60 Markss )

3 Discuss the factors that might act upon whether or non Oakfield plc uses its hard currency balances, instead than portions or bonds to do payment for Bird. ( 20 Markss )

Total ( 100 Markss )

Learning Results:

The instance presents a comparing of assorted rating attacks that are utile in Corporate Finance. It allows pupils to compare different discounted hard currency flow methodological analysiss. The learning aim is to acquire pupils to believe difficult about the overall scheme of the company and the nature of the chance that arises from the command, together with a consideration of funding issues.

Assessment Criteria.

Mark 70 % + Excellent criterion, showing a thorough apprehension of theoretical and practical issues with good grounds of research, good analytical accomplishments demoing penetration. Very good planned, logical sequence, clear composing manner & A ; complete & A ; accurate referencing.

Mark 50 % + Good comprehensive reply showing a sound cognition of theoretical and practical issues. Evidence of research and presentation of analytical accomplishments. Good presentation, with equal referencing.

Q3. Pymnt?

The differentiation between hard currency and common stock funding in a amalgamation is an of import

one. If hard currency is used, the cost of an acquisition is non dependent on the acquisition additions.

All other things being the same, if common stock is used, the cost is higher because

Firm A ‘s stockholders must portion the acquisition additions with the stockholders of Firm B.

However, if the NPV of the acquisition is negative, so the loss will be shared between

the two houses.

Whether a house should finance an acquisition with hard currency or with portions of stock depends

on several factors, including the followers:

1. Sharing additions. If hard currency is used to finance an acquisition, the merchandising house ‘s

stockholders will non take part in the possible additions from the amalgamation. Of class,

if the acquisition is non a success, the losingss will non be shared, and stockholders of

the geting house will be worse off than if stock had been used.

2. Taxes. Acquisition by paying hard currency normally consequences in a nonexempt dealing.

Acquisition by interchanging stock is by and large tax-exempt.

3. Control. Acquisition by paying hard currency does non impact the control of the geting house.

Acquisition with voting portions may hold deductions for control of the incorporate house.

In the 1980s, hard currency trades were the regulation. In the 1990s, stock trades became much more

common. Today, hard currency trades are comparatively rare, at least in big amalgamations.

Form of Payment or Entire Consideration

Determining the proper signifier of payment can be a complicated exercising. Each signifier of

payment can hold significantly different deductions for the parties involved in the dealing.

Of the entire minutess between 1980 and 2006, on norm, hard currency accounted for

45 per centum, stock for 30 per centum, and cash-stock combinations for 25 per centum of the

minutess ( Mergerstat Review, 2007 ) .


The usage of hard currency is the simplest and most normally used agencies of payment for geting

portions or assets. Although hard currency payments by and large result in an immediate revenue enhancement liability

for the mark company ‘s stockholders, there is no ambiguity about the value of the

dealing, every bit long as no part of the payment is deferred. Whether hard currency is the predominant

signifier of payment depends on a assortment of factors. These include the acquirer ‘s

current purchase, possible near-term net incomes per portion dilution, the marketer ‘s penchant

for hard currency or acquirer stock, and the extent to which the acquirer wishes to keep


of involvement to do a hard currency purchase practical. Publishing new portions may ensue in important

eroding of the combined house ‘s net incomes per portion instantly following shutting,

which may turn out to be unacceptable to investors. The Sellerss ‘ penchant for stock or hard currency

reflects their possible capital additions and the attraction of the acquirer ‘s portions. Finally,

a bidder may take to utilize hard currency instead than publish voting portions if the voting control of its

dominant stockholder is threatened as a consequence of the issue of voting stock to get

the mark house ( Faccio and Marsulis, 2005 ) . The penchant for utilizing hard currency appears to be

much higher in western European states, where ownership tends to be more to a great extent

concentrated in publically traded houses than in the United States. In Europe, 63 per centum

of publically traded houses have a individual stockholder who straight or indirectly controls 20

per centum or more of the vote portions ; in the United States, the figure is 28 per centum ( Faccio

and Lang, 2002 ) .

Noncash Forms of Payment

The usage of common equity may affect certain revenue enhancement advantages for the parties involved.

This is particularly true for the merchandising company stockholders. However, the usage of portions

is much more complicated than hard currency, because it requires conformity with the prevailing

security Torahs ( see Chapter 2 ) . Furthermore, the acquirer ‘s portion monetary value may endure if investors

believe that the freshly issued portions will ensue in a long-run dilution in net incomes per

portion ( EPS, a decrease in an single stockholder ‘s claim on future net incomes and the

assets that produce those net incomes ) . The usage of exchangeable preferable stock or debt can

be attractive to both purchasers and Sellerss. Convertible preferable stock provides some downside

protection to Sellerss in the signifier of go oning dividends, while supplying upside

possible if the acquirer ‘s common stock monetary value additions above the transition point.

Acquirers frequently find exchangeable debt attractive because of the revenue enhancement deductibility of involvement

payments. The major disadvantage in utilizing securities of any type is that the marketer may

happen them unattractive. Debt instruments may be unacceptable because of the perceived

high hazard of default associated with the issuer. When offered common equity, stockholders

of the merchandising company may experience the growing chances of the acquirer ‘s stock may be limited

or the historical volatility of the stock makes it intolerably hazardous. Finally, debt or

equity securities may be illiquid because of the little size of the resale market.

Other signifiers of payment include existent belongings, rights to rational belongings, royalties,

earn-outs, and contingent payments. Real belongings consists of such things as a package

of existent estate. Alleged like-kind exchanges or barters may hold favourable revenue enhancement effects

( see Chapter 12 ) . Real belongings exchanges are most common in commercial existent

estate minutess. Allowing the marketer entree to valuable licences or franchises bounds the

usage of hard currency or securities at the clip of shutting ; nevertheless, it does raise the possibility that

the marketer could go a future rival. The usage of debt or other types of deferred

payments reduces the overall present value of the purchase monetary value to the purchaser by switching

some part of the purchase monetary value into the hereafter.

Using a Combination of Cash and Stock

Bidders may utilize a combination of hard currency and noncash signifiers of payment as portion of their

command schemes to broaden the entreaty to aim stockholders. Payment options may

include all hard currency, all stock, and a combination of hard currency and stock. The hard currency option entreaties

to those stockholders who either topographic point a high value on liquidness or do non see acquirer

stock as attractive. The all-stock option is attractive to aim stockholders who may be

interested in postponing their revenue enhancement liabilities in a share-for-share exchange or who find the

acquirer portions attractive. Finally, the combination of hard currency and stock should appeal to

those who value hard currency but besides want to take part in any grasp in the acquirer ‘s


The command scheme of offering mark house stockholders multiple-payment options

increase the likeliness that more mark house stockholders will take part in a stamp

offer. Such command schemes are common in “ auction ” environments or when the bidder

is unable to borrow the sum necessary to back up an all-cash offer or unwilling

to absorb the possible net incomes per portion dilution in an all-stock offer. However, the

multiple-option command scheme introduces a certain degree of uncertainness in finding

the sum of hard currency the acquirer finally has to pay out to aim steadfast stockholders,

since the figure taking the all-cash or cash-and-stock option is non known prior to

the completion of the stamp offer. Acquirers resolve this issue by including a “ proration

clause ” in stamp offers and amalgamation understandings, which allows them to repair the sum

sum of hard currency they finally have to pay out at the clip the stamp offer is initiated.

How this is done is illustrated subsequently in Case Study 11-6.

Case Study 11-1 illustrates how the signifier of payment can be used as a cardinal constituent

of a coup d’etat scheme. Note how Equity Office Properties ‘ board carefully weighed

the greater certainty of Blackstone ‘s all-cash offer against the greater value of the

combination of hard currency and stock offered by Vornado in doing its determination of to whom

to sell.

Pull offing Hazard and Closing the Gap on Price

In an all-cash dealing, the hazards accrue wholly to the purchaser. Despite thorough due diligence,

there is no confidence that the purchaser will hold uncovered all the hazards associated with

the mark. During the dialogue stage, the purchaser and marketer manoeuvre to portion the perceived

hazard and apportion the possible returns. In making so, significant differences originate

between what the purchaser is willing to pay and what the marketer believes the concern is deserving.

Postclosing balance-sheet accommodations and escrow histories, earn-outs and other

contingent payments, contingent value rights, presenting investing, rights to intellectual

belongings, licensing fees, and confer withing understandings normally are used to consummate

the trade, when purchasers and Sellerss can non make understanding on purchase monetary value.

July 22, 2017