There is small value in fixing a cookery book of formulas for struggle success. The effects of struggle interaction depend straight on what the participants do mentally with conflict behaviors-that is, how they process and interpret those behaviours. – William Cupach & A ; Daniel Canary
Lectures about struggles:
Conflict present two facets: emotional and issue. It means, when a individual is involved in a struggle, some people will concentrate on the emotional side whereas others people on the issue side. In another manner, if I am to concentrate on the first side, I will be concentrated on my emotion, on how much I hate this individual who I am reasoning with alternatively of seeking to understand what is traveling on, why are we reasoning?
Article: working with struggles:
‘Conflicts are dissensions that lead to tenseness within, and between, people ‘ harmonizing toaˆ¦ , ‘disagreements concerns the issue, whereas the tenseness effects the relation ‘
The five dimension of struggle: in order to understand the struggle ‘s context
Escalate struggle PPT + Article
I ntercultural struggles:
How to pull off a struggle?
Five dimensions of conflict direction: Thomas and Kilman, 1974 = & gt ; cg web article
PPT p12: Sharing, negociation, duologue, researching
Different values, demands, of import to work out the struggle? why? californium. PPT struggle declaration p13
Examples: exercising with Priscilla during the first class. We have a list of 30 values in forepart of us and we have to cancel 20 at the beginning, after choose 5 between 10 values left. My most of import values were: aˆ¦ . But it was n’t the same for everyone, my neighbour, for case, had aˆ¦ .
NVC managing a struggle? ( web site: hypertext transfer protocol: //sites.google.com/site/integralconflictresolution/conflic-resolution/nonviolent-communication )
+ : duologue: p.16 PPT: happen a quotation mark on duologue and explain with talks of Mette
Dialogue: article p.17 online
Point of position as a future leader?
Most learning points:
What did I understand from the struggle with the Swedish miss?
What do I Want to hold more of?
Intercultural communicating in contexts p.448 = & gt ; declaration of struggle: geographic expedition
Intercultural struggle declaration = & gt ; intercultural competency?
A struggle can go on everyplace to everyone. It can be on the resort area: two kids ‘s are reasoning to hold the same plaything, it can be in company: two employees aˆ¦ or it can be a national struggle: the existent civil war in Syria for case. Conflicts present two facets: emotional and issue. It means, when a individual is involved in a struggle, some people will concentrate on the emotional side whereas others people on the issue side. In another manner, if I am to concentrate on the first side, I will be concentrated on my emotion, on how much I hate this individual who I am reasoning with, alternatively of seeking to understand what is traveling on, why are we reasoning? ‘Conflicts are dissensions that lead to tenseness within, and between, people ‘ harmonizing toaˆ¦ , ‘disagreements concerns the issue, whereas the tenseness effects the relation ‘
A garder ou effacer auto pas intercultural struggle?
An intercultural struggle isA :
Impression of ethnocentrism: people are measuring other civilization utilizing prepossessions compare to their ain civilization.
Why is it go oning? = & gt ; people come from different civilization, “ have different wonts, different values, different thoughts about what is right or incorrect ” ( trouver d’ou ca vient, cours? )
ABC Model PPT p.9?
In order to work out the struggle, it ‘s of import to understand what is it about? What is the context of this struggle? To recognize this, I will depict and utilize the five dimensions of struggle in my struggle context ( give voice a reecrire ) . Example with Swedish miss and the kitchenwith p.6 PPT + escalation of struggle
As a future leader, it ‘s of import to be cognizant that I should be able to see this 5 dimensions. Normally people are focused in one dimension. ( seek to happen article which is sum uping intercultural struggle in leading context )
( expression at every PPT because Mette is making some advice as a future leader )
Second construct: Categorizing Stereotypes
Explain the construct:
Elysabeth Plum: p.73-75: worlds have the inclination to categorise everything in order to to ease their life.
E.P, p.78: we fundamentally communicate with other people as if they were similar ourselves
High and Low context:
Article Executive coaching in a transverse cultural context:
P.263: high context: “ inexplicit communicating ; the significance of gestures, position, voice, and context.
Low context: “ expressed communicating ; clear and elaborate instructions ”
Web site: hypertext transfer protocol: //jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue1/wuertz.html
In order to separate among civilizations, Hall ( 1976 ) proposed a set of parametric quantities to assist locate civilizations along a dimension crossing from the High-Context/low-content class to the Low-Context/high-content class ( Figure 1 ) .
Book Intercultural communicating in contexts:
Harmonizing to N.Martin and K.Nakayama, it exists few ‘communication manner ‘ which they define ‘how hearers are expected to accept and construe verbal message ‘ ( 2010, p.228 ) . One of this ‘communication manner ‘ construct is the high and low context. This theory was introduced by E. T. Hall ( 1976 ) in order to seek to do the difference among civilizations. Indeed,
( Judith N.Martin and Thomas K.Nakayama )
The high context communicating is when “ more of the information in the physical context or internalized in the individual ” ( Hall, 1976, p. 79 ) . In other words, it means that the non verbal communicating and the context is more of import that what people say. For case, I was speaking with Charlotte, Laura and AnaA?s about holding kids. Charlotte and Laura shared the same point of position: to hold kids before the age of 20 eight old ages old. AnaA?s and me had already discussed about that earlier and we agreed that we do n’t desire kids before 30. So when Charlotte and Laura expressed their sentiments, AnaA?s and me had an eyes contact and made a amusing face. So this illustration can exemplify high context communicating. The eyes contact we made with Anais is because we are friends, we already speak about this topic, we shared an apprehension so we did n’t necessitate to talk to show ourselves. On the other manus, the construct of low context in communicating includes “ expressed verbal ” ( 2010, p.228, N.Martin and K.Nakayama ) communicating. So the context or the topographic point of the communicating does n’t truly count, the most of import is what people are stating, the full “ metamessage ” ( 2010, p.228, N.Martin and K.Nakayama ) is contained in the address. For illustration, when I speak about my MBA in leading and direction with my friends in France, it does n’t do sense for them. For case, a Gallic friends asked me: what will be your subject of your thesis? I answered: toxic leading. She was n’t able to understand because in Gallic university we used to hold topics as finance, economic sciences, mathematics, etc. So leading, as a topic is really different and I have to explicate in inside informations what is it approximately. In the antonym, when I speak with my MBA ‘s schoolmates on my thesis subject, they understand clearly what I ‘ll speak about and I do n’t necessitate to be expressed. Why? Because we have “ codifications ” , looks in our category, ?
So as I can see, ( nexus with intercultural communicating = & gt ; table P.71 book )
Make nexus in international leading context + point of position as future leader
Try to happen an illustration ; during meeting if I am the leader and I will do a certain mark which can intend something for a high context individual we can hold a misinterpretation.
Third construct: Cultural individuality
Cf. these on cross cultural direction: ikea Canada versus ikea Sweden
p.99: ‘The professional civilizations has two maps which one is to make an individuality for rank and employees ‘
p.198: ‘values belong to the domain of individuality: aˆ¦ ‘
“ Culture is the H2O in which we swim and merely like fish we do n’t cognize what H2O is, we take it for granted ” E.P
hypertext transfer protocol: //biznik.com/members/annie-sabarte-echevarria-ma-maol-lmhc/articles/cultural-identity-part-one-leadership-diversity
hypertext transfer protocol: //issuu.com/bitcdiversity/docs/leadership__and_cultural_identity? mode=window & A ; viewMode=doublePage:
As every adult females thought in the study, ‘their ain individuality manus an impact on theior leading manner ”
Explain what is this construct
Relevance in intercultural communicating context
Undertaking 3: The research country of intercultural communicating
Summary of the articles
Cf. article specifying the content sphere of intercultural competency: talk about changing conceptualisations, ?
Notes Rethinking cross cultural direction in a globalizing concern universe:
-main thought articles:
-arguments for this thought:
-which theories/ideas are presented
“ to raise consciousness about the fact that civilization can no longer be equated with state ” ( p.382 )
( give voice debut ) Through this two articles, we can understand that to happen a good definition of civilization is non that easy. If we look at research made, we can detect a batch of different definitions. Why?
We learn in this articles civilization has been studied from different field: anthropology, psychological science, sociology, direction, and so on. Therefore, it exists different definition, reading about civilization ‘s construct because when you are anthropologist you are looking for some information related to your capable. But this information wo n’t be searched by a director or a psychologist. So there are different definition because people who had made surveies had different position, different outlook, focal point, searched..
Part 4: Person: Personal contemplation study
Definition of cultural intelligence: