Title: Choose ONE of the undermentioned transitions and compose a close commentary on it. You should turn up the transition within the text, and demo how it is related to the construction of the narrative or novel as a whole. Your essay might include a treatment of some of the followers: the ways in which relationships between characters are developed in the transition ; linguistic communication and imagination ; the scene ; narrative technique ; the ways in which the transition develops thoughts and subjects raised in the novel or narrative as a whole, or in the other narratives you have studied by the author concerned ; and anything else which you find interesting or important. You should take to bring forth a coherent essay instead than a list of points or replies.
3. E.M.Forster: fromLeslie howards End, Chapter 14.
Poor Jacky! She was non a bad kind, and had a great trade to bear. She drew her ain decision she was merely capable of pulling one decision and in the comprehensiveness of clip she acted upon it. All the Friday Leonard had refused to talk to her, and had spent the eventide detecting the stars. On the Saturday he went up, as usual, to town, but he came non back Saturday dark, nor Sunday forenoon, nor Sunday afternoon. The incommodiousness grew unbearable, and though she was now of a retiring wont, and shy of adult females, she went up to Wickham Place. Leonard returned in her absence. The card, the fatal card, was gone from the pages of Ruskin, and he guessed what had happened.
‘Well? ’ he had exclaimed, recognizing her with rolls of laughter. ‘I know where you’ve been, but you don’t cognize where I’ve been.’
Jacky sighed, said, ‘Len, I do believe you might explicate, ’ and resumed domesticity.
Explanations were hard at this phase, and Leonard was excessively silly or, it is alluring to compose, excessively sound a fellow to try them. His reserve was non wholly the cheapjack article that a concern life promotes, the reserve that pretends that nil is something, and fells behind the Daily Telegraph. The adventurer, besides, is untalkative, and it is an escapade for a clerk to walk for a few hours in darkness. You may express joy at him, you who have slept darks out on the veldt, with your rifle beside you and all the ambiance of escapade rap. And you may besides express joy who think escapades silly. But do non be surprised if Leonard is diffident whenever he meets you, and if the Schlegels instead than Jacky hear about the morning.
That the Schlegels had non thought him foolish became a lasting joy. He was at his best when he thought of them. It buoyed him as he journeyed place beneath attenuation celestial spheres. Somehow the barriers of wealth had fallen, and at that place had been he could non give voice it a general averment of the admiration of the universe. ‘My conviction’ , says the mysterious, ‘gains boundlessly the minute another psyche will believe in it, ’ and they had agreed that there was something beyond life’s day-to-day grey. He took off his top-hat and smoothed it thoughtfully. He had hitherto supposed the unknown to be books, literature, cagey conversation, civilization. One raised oneself by survey, and got tops with the universe. But in that speedy interchange a new visible radiation dawned. Was that ‘something’ walking in the dark among suburban hills?
He discovered that he was traveling bareheaded down Regent Street. London came back with a haste. Few were approximately at this hr, but all whom he passed looked at him with a ill will that was the more impressive because it was unconscious. He put his chapeau on. It was excessively large ; his caput disappeared like a pudding into a basin, the ears flexing outwards at the touch of the curly lip. He wore it a small backwards, and its consequence was greatly to stretch the face and to convey out the distance between the eyes and the mustache. Thus equipped, he escaped unfavorable judgment. No one felt uneasy as he tittuped along the pavings, the bosom of a adult male clicking fast in his thorax.
This transition from Forster’s novel of 1910,Leslie howards End, brings together most of the cardinal concerns of the novel: the desire for societal alteration, the connexion between the urban and the rural, the cultural divide between the categories and the atomization of society. Leonard Bast is symbolic of all of these and his erratic personality reflects the fluctuation of the society in which he exists.
Opening with the exclamatory, “Poor Jacky! ” ( Forster, 123 ) the extract involves the reader straight with the place of such adult females as Jacky, Bast’s married woman, in modern-day society. Depicted as a adult female of low societal category, though Forster notes ironically, early in the novel, that “we are non concerned with the really poor” who are “unthinkable” ( Forster, 45 ) , she is said to be “not a bad sort” ( Forster, 123 ) . She is the object of commiseration, scorn and frequently even contempt, particularly by her hubby, her junior by several old ages. Portrayed as instead an nescient adult female “she was merely capable of pulling one conclusion” and instead petroleum, Jacky plays a cardinal portion in the novel as she non merely enables Forster to develop the relationships between Leonard and the Schlegels, but besides facilitates a crisis in the matrimony of Margaret Schlegel and Henry Wilcox when she is revealed, later in the book, as holding been Henry’s lover, which in bend exposes the lip service of modern-day society. As has been remarked, at this clip “in England, fiction took a sociological turn” ( Macaulay, 98 ) .
Further, the reader infers the sexual overtness of Jacky in that the decision she draws is that Leonard has been someway indecently involved with the Schlegels, whose card she has discovered in one of Bast’s books, significantly one by Ruskin, whose artistic esthesias Bast efforts, futilely, to emulate, hence his passing the “evening detecting the stars” ( Forster, 123 ) . The fact that she views her husband’s absence as an “inconvenience” ( Forster, 123 ) leads the reader to say that she feels less love for her hubby than dependence, as is, so, the instance. The text makes clears that Jacky is “now of a retiring wont, and shy of women” ( Forster, 123 ) which implies that she was non ever “retiring” and that she is, possibly,non“shy” of work forces. Forster therefore neatly develops the character of Jacky by pulling the reader’s attending to her reaction to the “fatal card” ( 124 ) her hubby hoarded wealths as a nexus with the aesthetic upper-classes and non for the instead vulgar grounds she assumes.
However, Forster’s representation of Bast, here, is by no agencies entirely favorable. Earlier in the novel, he has been said to be “on the utmost brink of gentility” ( Forster, 45 ) and he is utterly dismissive of Jacky, “greeting her with rolls of laughter” ( Forster, 124 ) and instead childishly self-praise that he “know [ s ] where [ she’s ] been, but [ she doesn’t ] cognize where [ he’s ] been” ( Forster, 124 ) . The power battle between them is reduced to the degree of common humiliation, with small grounds of fondness or lovingness. Bast’s refusal to portion any sort of cognition with his married woman but willingness to portion it with the Schlegels is declarative of his turning familiarity with them and his increasing distancing from her. In fact, it is interesting to observe that the relationships between the characters develop in exactly opposite manner. Bast was sexually attracted to Jacky foremost and this dissipates as he finds her lacking in other countries he seeks to research, whereas with the Schlegels, the first mark of attractive force is the esteem of aesthetic esthesia to which Bast aspires and which he perceives the Schlegels possess ; merely subsequently does he go sexually intimate with Helen. To some extent this is reflected in Forster’s life every bit good as his other work, inventive esthesia often being a directive which connects with a subliminal disclosure of his personal sexual ambivalency, in narratives such as the 1912 narrative, “The Curate’s Friend” ( Forster,Collected Short Narratives, 87 ) , for illustration ; as Lionel Trilling has pointed out: “we are ever witting of an author” ( in Schorer, 195 ) .
However, Forster pauses to explicate Bast’s “reticence” ( Forster, 124 ) as “not wholly the cheapjack article that a concern life promotes, the reserve that pretends that nil is something, and fells behind the Daily Telegraph” ( Forster, 124 ) . By therefore imparting a specific dignity to Bast’s grounds for keeping back from sharing his experience of “something” ( Forster, 124 ) with Jacky and her “domesticity” ( Forster, 124 ) , the writer shows Bast’s directives to be different from the mere dismissal by the multitudes who seek merely to stay distant from larger issues such as ecological concerns of saving, one of the major subjects of the novel. Bast’s experience is excessively particular to portion unless appreciated, as the Schlegel’s have done, and the writer declares himself “tempt [ erectile dysfunction ] ” ( Forster, 124 ) to name him “too sound” ( Forster, 124 ) to “explain” ( Forster, 124 ) . Forster involves the reader in an uncomfortable rating of Bast’s grounds for his “reticence” ( Forster, 124 ) , and the importance of an interlocutor’s receptive abilities. Clearly, for any creative person, in Forster’s instance a author, the ability of the receiver to make as the novel requires and “only connect” , as he states on his rubric page, is cardinal to the originative procedure. Bast recognises that Jacky would be both unwilling to grok and incapable of understanding his feelings, as Forster suggests his readers might be:
You may express joy at him, you who have slept darks out on the veldt [ … ] you may besides express joy who think escapades silly. But do non be surprised if Leonard is diffident whenever he meets you, and if the Schlegels instead than Jacky hear about the morning ( Forster, 124 ) .
The writer suggests that the construct of what really constitutes an “adventure” is to some extent comparative and that those who deprecate the desires of those like Bast who seek to widen their actual and aesthetic skylines should be the true objects of the contempt they heap on others. Indeed, he goes so far as to propose that such individuals exclude themselves, as Jacky does, from familiarity with a great part of world, staying “ [ Dis ] connect [ ed ] ” . ( This links Forster with other writers of the clip, such as H.G. Wells, who in his precisely modern-day novel of 1910,The History of Mr. Polly, besides creates a suburban adult male who longs to get away the confines of his Grey being. )
Furthermore, Forster develops this by saying how much the Schlegels’ willingness and ability to portion his “adventure” and “had non thought him foolish became a lasting joy” ( Forster, 124 ) ; the “permanence” is of important importance for “he was at his best when he thought of them” ( Forster, 124 ) and “it buoyed him as he journeyed place beneath melting heavens” ( Forster, 124 ) . Like Wordsworth, Bast continues to experience pleasance in an experience in purdah and this is facilitated by the sensitiveness of the Schlegels.
Forster credits this empathic esthesia with the ability to interrupt down category barriers, “somehow the barriers of wealth had fallen” ( Forster, 124 ) , and besides stresses the possibility of generic association between human existences: “a general averment of the admiration of the world” ( Forster, 124 ) because “they had agreed that there was something beyond life’s day-to-day gray” ( Forster, 124 ) . It is as if the “agreement” is every bit of import as the experience since it promotes the thought of corporate consciousness and besides the thought that this is indispensable: the subject that world should “only connect” , is primary in this novel, the “mystic [ Al ] ” ( Forster, 124 ) being a basic subliminal to the text throughout.
Here, so, Forster uses Bast as a conjunction with yet another major subject of the novel, the thought of the mystical in life. The first Mrs. Wilcox is symbolic of this and her acknowledgment of this in Margaret Schlegel leads to her go forthing her darling house, the titular Howards End, to Margaret, underpinning the whole novel with a desire for the saving of both nature and enigma. The imagination of the “stars” ( Forster, 123 ) and the “heavens” ( Forster, 124 ) in this transition echoes this and develops the thought that nature is an internal conjunction with the external, advancing an image of a numinous “something” ( Forster, 124 ) as a deeper, more permanent signifier of cognition which has nil to make with larning as such but everything to make with belief ; merely as Mrs. Wilcox tells Margaret earlier in the novel that the wych-elm at Howards End had powers to mend every bit long as people “believed” ( 72 ) in it. Mrs. Wilcox’s cognition of what Margaret describes with love as “folklore” ( 72 ) is really different from what Bast aspires to get yet he is get downing, in this transition to believe really otherwise:
He had hitherto supposed the unknown to be books, literature, cagey conversation, civilization. One raised oneself by survey, and got tops with the universe. But in that speedy interchange a new visible radiation dawned. Was that ‘something’ walking in the dark among suburban hills? ( Forster, 124 )
Bast’s connexion of what he has experienced entirely, transmuted by his converse with the Schlegels, has developed his perceptual experience of what is genuinely of value. His construct of the “unknown” as being related to sensitiveness to and perceptual experience of the cryptic switches his end in life, so, it changes what he basically believes to be “the unknown” . Again, Forster uses the natural imagination of “new light” and “dawn” to show this, which is closely connected with the thought of hapless false belief, a term coined by Ruskin, in the pages of one of whose books Bast has enclosed the Schlegels’ card. Bast has taken a different route on the journey from that on which he set out and learned that cognition is less a affair of books than of esthesia to the enigmas of the existence: the “‘something’ walking in the dark among suburban hills” . Like Forster’s minister of religion in the narrative mentioned earlier, his eyes have been opened to different possibilities and he is enriched by it.
The fact that Forster chooses to do his hills “suburban” links his airy subjects back to Bast’s perceptual experience by the universe in general and he moves on, here, to discourse Bast’s preoccupation with his vesture, since he sees this as a nexus with his position and “he discovered that he was traveling bareheaded down Regent Street” ( Forster, 125 ) . There is a sense in which the reader might deduce the pathetic in this, particularly as Forster describes him in amusing footings: “his caput disappeared like a pudding into a basin, the ears flexing outwards at the touch of the curly brim” ( Forster, 125 ) . By contrasting the ocular image Bast nowadayss with the ideas with which he is preoccupied, Forster connects his major subjects of societal category and doctrine. Bast is seen as one of many, so he seeks to “escape criticism” ( Forster, 125 ) and to upset no-one, to do no-one “uneasy” ( Forster, 125 ) , to be mostly unseeable. Yet his interior life is governed by the singular, set apart from the multitudes “the bosom of a adult male clicking fast in his chest” ( Forster, 125 ) as if he is truly cognizant of his ain verve as a “man” for the first clip.
In the concluding analysis, this transition encompasses the major subjects of Forster’s novel whilst besides supplying a conjunction between the characters and the narrative. Forster’s method is allied to this, in that he invariably provides links between both subject and character throughout the novel which are closely interlacing. Forster’s concerns, such as to continue both the rural in architecture and the land itself, are symbolised by the house which is cardinal to the book, and clear even in transitions where the house is non really mentioned: Forster’s thought than adult male should “only connect” being evidenced from start to complete in a novel which seeks itself “to connect” seemingly disparate thoughts. In Leonard Bast, Forster created a adult male with whom many could sympathize whilst at the same clip developing ideas with which much coeval authorship was concerned, depicting these, via Bast and his conjunctions, in footings which would be accessible to most. Indeed, the book-hungry Bast would himself, the reader feels, to the full comprehend the book’s most intimate and intricate subjects, both internal and external and therefore Forster fulfils his purpose to link.
Allott, Miriam Farris. Novelists on the Novel. New York: Columbia University Press, 1959.
Beer, J.B. The Achievement of E. M. Forster. London: Chatto & A ; Windus, 1962.
Born, Daniel. The Birth of Liberal Guilt in the English Novel: Charles Dickens to H.G. Wells. Chapel Hill, NC, University of North Carolina Press, 1995.
Claridge, Laura and Langland, Elizabeth, explosive detection systems. Out of Boundaries: Male Writers and Gender ( erectile dysfunction ) Criticism. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 1990.
Forster, E.M. Howards End. New York: Vintage, 1954.
Forster, E.M. ‘The Curate’s Friend’ ,Collected Short Narratives. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1954 ) .
Macaulay, Rose. The Hagiographas of E. M. Forster. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1938.
Schorer, Mark. Modern British Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961.
Schwarz, Daniel R. The Humanistic Heritage: Critical Theories of the English Novel from James to Hillis Miller. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1986.
Tolley, Christopher. Domestic Biography: The Legacy of Evangelicalism in Four Nineteenth-Century Families. Oxford: Oxford University, 1997.
Walder, Dennis. The Realist Novel. New York: Routledge, 1995.