JohnA GrishamA is a good known modern AmericanA author, the authorA of many bestsellersA ( the so-calledA ” legalA thrillers ” ) , that wereA filmedA inA Hollywood. “ The Innocent Man: Murder and Injustice in a Small Town ” is a John Grisham’sA firstA bookA writtenA in the genreA of documentaryA detective.A
Talking about the secret plan of the book, above all it is deserving observing that the “ Innocent adult male ” is a documental novel.A JohnA Grisham, A who has a philosophicalA lookA at theA sadA things, A one time learned aA narrative about innocentA prisonersA on deathA punishment, A and holding studiedA itA inA every item, A had the courageA to writeA the book which reveals all the truth. The writer tells the narrative about the existent condemnable instance, revealsA the secretsA of theA investigationA and test, A andA alsoA characterizes theA work ofA the policeA in thisA example.A
“ TheA Innocent Man ” is a tragicA narrative ofA a immature adult male, A onceA famousA athleteA Ron Williamson, who was convictedA forA the slaying, A which heA did non commit.A The writer says that in this book he tried to demo a really existent condemnable instance, the tragic narrative of the unjustly convicted adult male, who was on decease row.A In fact, there are 10s and 100s of such narratives in America.A Author Grisham knows about this, as since the late 90 ‘s he studied the history of condemnable tests, when sometimes strong beliefs were imposed to innocent people.A In the writer ‘s afterword the reader will happen rather atrocious facts of the fact-finding and judicial dictatorship in America.
The narrative ofA RonA WilliamsA isA that heA was accusedA in theA slaying ofA DebbieA Carter.A DebbieA was brutallyA murderedA in her ownA place, A andA policeA neededA at all costsA to revealA aA offense, regardlessA ofA the factA thatA it was notA adequate evidenceA andA testimonyA in thisA instance. Suspicion fellA onA RonA Williams, primarilyA becauseA of hisA poorA reputationA andA personal features: “ after neglecting to do a calling of baseball, he became an alcoholic and drug user, and he had some mentalA disorder ( viz. bipolar upset, A andA schizophrenicA thoughts ) . It is of import that Ron was charged with DUIs and two colzas, although he was acquitted of those colza charges. So aA manA like RonA became a good discrepancy for constabulary as a suspect in the murderA of Debbie Carter.
It is deserving indicating thatA noneA of theA witnessesA whoA lastA sawA DebbieA aliveA that eveningA atA the clubA did non mentionA Ron, that is, A there was no directA evidenceA against him. In this instance, A constabularies had notA focused on otherA suspect Glen Gore, A whoA manyA timesA was mentioned in theA testimoniesA of informants: A heA was seen that nightA withA Carter, A that is, A in rule, A the factsA that say aboutA hisA candidacyA as theA mainA suspect. But the policeA chose RonA Williams, that says about incompetency of theA constabulary in the procedure of investigation.A
AlsoA the constabulary suspected that there were two slayings, even there was small grounds for that, and Williamson’sA friend, Dennis Fritz was suspected to be besides involved.A Despite the deficiency of grounds against Fritz, he was examined and the tester found his replies evasive. So Fritz was arrested, tried and convicted.A WhenA conductingA a criminalA investigationA and question, A it showed noA direct evidenceA of guiltA of the accused, especiallyA of Fritz, againstA whomA there was practically no evidence.A However, constabularies made deceits of facts, pressured suspects and other informants to convey the instance to an terminal. In this instance, A in factA the premier suspectA shouldA have beenA Gore, who wasA seenA with CarterA and was known as a individual she feared, who might hold killed her. So it remains ill-defined why the constabulary did non look into Glen Gore ‘s possible engagement in Debbie Carter ‘s murder.A ( Call, 2007 )
This isA a tragicA narrative ofA oneA character, but itA hidesA aA deeper significance, A viz. theA job of equity of justice.A For justiceA is an areaA whereA there is noA topographic point for errors, A sinceA eachA caseA meansA a individual ‘s destiny. The mainA issuesA addressed inA the bookA are: A HowA an innocentA adult male could appearA in decease row? WhyA trialA is conductedA with serious misdemeanors? A How muchA timeA and attempts are necessary for lawyersA toA save a life of aA bruisedA adult male? A These inquiries are answeredA by John GrishamA inA hisA remarkableA book.
The mainA thought ofA the bookA is the ideaA ofA a defenseless of a manA when he deals with authorities, whichA echoesA with the subject ofA an evilA fate.A After all, A the heroA wasA unjustly convicted, A andA could notA make anything about it, A thatA shows the brutalityA of the province justness systemA to theA fateA of people.A This subject is painful for Americans, who are proud of the state judicial system, which in world is far from ideal ( we can retrieve many literary plants and many films on this subject ) .A
The chief importance of the fresh “ Innocent Man ” is its vitality.A To compose it, the writer visited Ada, a town where the slaying occurred, visited the tribunal, prison, legion java stores, where he talked with the heroes of his hereafter book.A He visited the old and the new decease row at Macalester, the office of the Project “ Innocence ” in New York to garner necessary materials.A A Those travels while the work on a book opened to Grisham the universe of guiltless captives. Particularly judicialA errorsA are typical for the South America, where the writer was born, but in fact they occur instead frequently and practically in all provinces. The grounds for that are ever different, but the most common are the unjust work of constabularies, unqualified scrutinies, false testimonies, hapless work of attorneies, indolence and haughtiness of prosecuting officers.
But, A however, A the factA thatA RonA WilliamsonA wasA justified, A afterA yearsA spentA on decease row, A showsA that there are peopleA ( attorneies, journalists ) A whoA attention about theA fateA of those who areA inA prisonA under falseA andA unjustA accusals. In the book the writer really clearly shows the unskilled constabulary work, and common duty between the parties to the probe procedure, and the indifference of those who were sing a instance in tribunal, and the absence of any control system.A
In decision, I want to state that John Grisham is the maestro of detective genre.A ” Innocent Man ” A is a bookA in theA documentaryA genre, whichA has promptedA the authorA to the maximumA responsibilityA forA hisA words, A sharpenedA hisA observation accomplishments, A and made the highly topical andA realistic.